AI Policy

The Journal of AI-Enabled Engineering and Technical Education (JAIEETE) supports the responsible and transparent use of artificial intelligence in research and scholarly communication.

Use of AI by Authors

Authors may use AI-assisted tools to support manuscript preparation, analysis, coding, visualization, or other research-related tasks where appropriate.

Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and validity of all submitted content.

Substantive use of generative AI or similar tools must be disclosed in the manuscript. The disclosure should identify the tool used and briefly explain how it was used.

Routine use of AI for spelling, grammar, formatting, or minor language improvement does not normally require disclosure.

AI and Authorship

Artificial intelligence systems, chatbots, and large language models cannot be listed as authors or co-authors.

Authorship requires human responsibility and accountability for the submitted work.

Accuracy and Originality

Authors must verify all AI-assisted content, including text, data, references, calculations, code, and figures.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that AI-generated or AI-assisted material does not contain fabricated information, inaccurate references, plagiarism, copyright violations, or misleading content.

AI in Research Methods

When AI tools form part of the research method, data analysis, experimental procedure, or generation of research results, their use must be described clearly in the relevant section of the manuscript to support transparency and reproducibility.

Use of AI by Reviewers and Editors

Submitted manuscripts are confidential documents.

Reviewers and editors must not upload manuscripts, figures, data, reviewer reports, or other confidential material to publicly accessible AI systems where confidentiality and data protection cannot be assured.

Any permitted use of AI during editorial or peer-review activities must preserve confidentiality and must not replace independent scholarly judgment.

Human Responsibility

AI tools may assist scholarly work, but they do not replace human expertise, critical evaluation, or accountability.

Authors, reviewers, and editors remain responsible for all decisions and content associated with the publication process.